Re: [css-ruby] Conflict with HTML5 spec

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:40 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
> wrote:
> > On 02/23/2015 05:22 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:10 AM, fantasai <
> fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net
> >> <mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Personally I think it would be nice if <rb>B<rt>A</rt> just worked. :)
> >> > It's much more convenient to type.
> >>
> >> I agree, but HTML spec guys don't seem to agree with us :)
> >
> >
> > Hm, we could raise an issue, particularly if it's something we have
> > implemented. :)
>
> I'd prefer less anonymous box construction.  If people don't put
> <ruby>, it's an authoring mistake; there's no real need to "correct"
> things here.  (Particularly because of the non-obvious requirement for
> the last internal ruby element to be explicitly closed, when in all
> other cases you can omit the closing tag.)
>

I'm going to use this code (if no objection from the reviewer, though):

  ruby {
    display: ruby;
  }
  ruby > rp,
  ruby > rbc > rp,
  ruby > rtc > rp {
    display: none;
  }
  ruby > rbc {
    display: ruby-base-container;
  }
  ruby > rtc {
    display: ruby-text-container;
  }
  ruby > rb,
  ruby > rbc > rb {
    display: ruby-base;
    white-space: nowrap;
  }
  ruby > rt,
  ruby > rtc > rt {
    display: ruby-text;
  }
  ruby > rt,
  ruby > rtc,
  ruby > rtc > rt {
    font-variant-east-asian: ruby;
    text-emphasis: none;
    white-space: nowrap;
    line-height: 1;
  }
  ruby > rt,
  ruby > rtc {
    font-size: 50%;
  }
  ruby,
  ruby > rb,
  ruby > rt,
  ruby > rbc,
  ruby > rtc,
  ruby > rbc > rb,
  ruby > rtc > rt {
    unicode-bidi: isolate;
  }

It is a bit long, but it seems that this could match what the HTML spec
wants us to do.

- Xidorn