- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:29:51 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:40 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 02/23/2015 05:22 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:10 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net >> <mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>> wrote: >> > >> > Personally I think it would be nice if <rb>B<rt>A</rt> just worked. :) >> > It's much more convenient to type. >> >> I agree, but HTML spec guys don't seem to agree with us :) > > > Hm, we could raise an issue, particularly if it's something we have > implemented. :) I'd prefer less anonymous box construction. If people don't put <ruby>, it's an authoring mistake; there's no real need to "correct" things here. (Particularly because of the non-obvious requirement for the last internal ruby element to be explicitly closed, when in all other cases you can omit the closing tag.) ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2015 02:30:38 UTC