W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

Re: [css-ruby] Conflict with HTML5 spec

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:40:04 -0500
Message-ID: <54EBAC44.4040408@inkedblade.net>
To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 02/23/2015 05:22 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:10 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net <mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>> wrote:
> >
> > Personally I think it would be nice if <rb>B<rt>A</rt> just worked. :)
> > It's much more convenient to type.
>
> I agree, but HTML spec guys don't seem to agree with us :)

Hm, we could raise an issue, particularly if it's something we have implemented. :)

> It looks fine, but shouldn't we also prefix
> "ruby, rb, rt, rbc, rtc { unicode-bidi: isolate; }", and
> "rtc:lang(zh-TW), rt:lang(zh-TW) { font-size: 25%; }"?
>
> Leaving "rtc:lang(zh), rt:lang(zh) { ruby-align: center; }" not to start with "ruby >" is probably fine, though it could cause
> confusing behavior in some cases.

Maybe? I'm not sure it's worth it, but I don't suppose it matters much.

> And why did you change the font-size for bopomofo from 30% to 25%?

That was a mistake. Switched back.

~fantasai
Received on Monday, 23 February 2015 22:40:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:01 UTC