W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

Re: [css-ruby] Conflict with HTML5 spec

From: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:02:36 +1100
Message-ID: <CAMdq698-XnO52OYndwsC-8TLTQ+zvqfDx2LKupvkzJ3uELNdOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:40 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
wrote:

On 02/23/2015 05:22 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:10 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net
>> <mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>> wrote
>>
> It looks fine, but shouldn't we also prefix
>> "ruby, rb, rt, rbc, rtc { unicode-bidi: isolate; }", and
>> "rtc:lang(zh-TW), rt:lang(zh-TW) { font-size: 25%; }"?
>>
>> Leaving "rtc:lang(zh), rt:lang(zh) { ruby-align: center; }" not to start
>> with "ruby >" is probably fine, though it could cause
>> confusing behavior in some cases.
>>
>
> Maybe? I'm not sure it's worth it, but I don't suppose it matters much.
>

BTW, it might also make sense to change "rtc > rt" to "ruby > rtc > rt".

But... hmm... it becomes too complicated...

I wonder whether we can raise an issue to change the HTML parsing algorithm
to remove those outstanding tags, just like what we do for internal table
elements. I need to investigate how that works in the spec.

- Xidorn
Received on Monday, 23 February 2015 23:03:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:01 UTC