- From: Bobby Tung <bobbytung@wanderer.tw>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:25:37 +0800
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Cc: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <C118E6F2-2AA2-4F06-87F9-766BD4225A52@wanderer.tw>
I think the glyph of light tone mark should be altered by OpenType GSUB feature to compress its height in vertical writing. I’ll take a try. Bobby > Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> 於 2015年2月11日 上午9:01 寫道: > > FYI, according to the bopomofo manual I get, normally bopomofo in annotation has 30% font size, hence with 3 bopomofo characters, there is still 10% for the light tone. And the light tone mark usually only occupies roughly 6.7%. > > - Xidorn > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com <mailto:kojiishi@gmail.com>> wrote: > BTW, one cell in the figure 4 in the Richard's blog[1] has 4 > characters including the light tone mark. Do you think that's why > WebKit uses 25%? > > [1] http://rishida.net/scripts/bopomofo/ontheweb#vertical <http://rishida.net/scripts/bopomofo/ontheweb#vertical> > > /koji > > > On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:46 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net <mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>> wrote: > > On 01/26/2015 10:15 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > >> > >> > >> I don't think Taiwan publishers would often enlarge the size because that > >> would cause the annotation exceed the boundary of > >> one character, which I think rarely happens. > >> > >> But it makes me wonder whether ruby-text should be computed according to > >> ruby-position. It's probably true that > >> inter-character will only be used in Taiwan, however it is not true that > >> Taiwan people only use inter-character. They may use > >> other values as well, and in those cases, the font-size should also be > >> 30%, because it is the usual font-size for bopomofo. > >> > >> Maybe the best way is not introducing a new keyword, but specifying a > >> locale-dependent default stylesheet. > > > > > > Given that the sizing is script-dependent and not position-dependent, > > this makes sense to me. > > > > ~fantasai > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2015 01:26:16 UTC