W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

Re: [css-ruby] Default font-size of ruby annotation with ruby-position: inter-character

From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:33:51 +0900
Message-ID: <CAN9ydbWKj=BB0dkdeDqfzn-+SO8Cj0y+BS_CBapx_T+Fx6Ka=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
BTW, one cell in the figure 4 in the Richard's blog[1] has 4
characters including the light tone mark. Do you think that's why
WebKit uses 25%?

[1] http://rishida.net/scripts/bopomofo/ontheweb#vertical

/koji


On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:46 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 10:15 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't think Taiwan publishers would often enlarge the size because that
>> would cause the annotation exceed the boundary of
>> one character, which I think rarely happens.
>>
>> But it makes me wonder whether ruby-text should be computed according to
>> ruby-position. It's probably true that
>> inter-character will only be used in Taiwan, however it is not true that
>> Taiwan people only use inter-character. They may use
>> other values as well, and in those cases, the font-size should also be
>> 30%, because it is the usual font-size for bopomofo.
>>
>> Maybe the best way is not introducing a new keyword, but specifying a
>> locale-dependent default stylesheet.
>
>
> Given that the sizing is script-dependent and not position-dependent,
> this makes sense to me.
>
> ~fantasai
>
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2015 14:34:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:01 UTC