- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:33:51 +0900
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
BTW, one cell in the figure 4 in the Richard's blog[1] has 4 characters including the light tone mark. Do you think that's why WebKit uses 25%? [1] http://rishida.net/scripts/bopomofo/ontheweb#vertical /koji On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:46 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 01/26/2015 10:15 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote: >> >> >> I don't think Taiwan publishers would often enlarge the size because that >> would cause the annotation exceed the boundary of >> one character, which I think rarely happens. >> >> But it makes me wonder whether ruby-text should be computed according to >> ruby-position. It's probably true that >> inter-character will only be used in Taiwan, however it is not true that >> Taiwan people only use inter-character. They may use >> other values as well, and in those cases, the font-size should also be >> 30%, because it is the usual font-size for bopomofo. >> >> Maybe the best way is not introducing a new keyword, but specifying a >> locale-dependent default stylesheet. > > > Given that the sizing is script-dependent and not position-dependent, > this makes sense to me. > > ~fantasai >
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2015 14:34:23 UTC