- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:55:40 +1100
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
On 08/02/15 10:13, Florian Rivoal wrote: > On 08 Feb 2015, at 09:45, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: >> With the goal of eventually retiring CSS 2, does it make sense for >> its chapters 1 and 2 (About and Introduction) to be moved into >> (superseded by something in) CSS Snapshot? Chapter 3 as well. > See this discussion that starts here, on mostly the same topic: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0069.html Interesting. I personally would very much like CSS 2.x to become as obsolete as CSS 1 is today. I know it’s gonna take time, but we’ll work toward it piece by piece. > I would say eventually yes, but it's going to be a while until CSS2 > is retired, so there is no rush to find a new host for the intro. Sure, there is no rush. But if we’re making a new Snapshot it’s a good opportunity to pull in the intro and other things that don’t really fit in any specific module, making fewer pieces of 2.x we need to find a new home for. >> By the way, I made a mapping of CSS 2 sections to Level 3+ specs >> that supersede them: > > Nice! Although I think we should extend bikeshed so that we can have > some metadata in the .bs file for declaring what section of what > specs (if any) a spec is superseding or extending, and generate > directly from that both the "modules interaction" section of each > spec as well as the kind mapping you've been doing manually. Sure, I’d be happy to point to a generated thing rather than maintain it manually. >> https://github.com/servo/servo/wiki/Relevant-spec-links#css-2 > > You're missing 18.1 and 18.4, which are superseded by css3-ui (and > maybe other things, but at least that). Thanks, added. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Sunday, 8 February 2015 02:56:10 UTC