W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

Re: [css-scoping] Shadow Cascading

From: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:24:47 +0100
Message-ID: <CANz6XvSQ1EddbwFDxunTeiO3jJ_JpW7UhT8dKW87zENpg40anQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com> wrote:

>> If so, using "tree of trees" might mislead to think otherwise.
>
> Eh, if you just follow the algorithm it's impossible to screw up.  And
> "tree of trees" is the term I want, as it applies between sibling
> shadow trees.

OK, I'm fine with using "tree of trees", but aren't sibling shadow
trees also different scopes? That is, the scoping root is the shadow
root and sibling shadow trees each have a separate shadow root? They
currently are in Blink fwiw.

-- 
Rune Lillesveen
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 08:25:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:01 UTC