- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 20:48:40 -0800
- To: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com> wrote: > In [1] you have: > > "When comparing two declarations, if one of them is in a shadow tree > and the other is in a document that contains that shadow tree, then > for normal rules the declaration from the outer document wins, and for > important rules the declaration from the shadow tree wins." > > What about nested shadow trees? Could "document" be "shadow tree" as well? Yes. I don't know if we have good terminology to mean "chunk of content, which can be a document or a shadow tree". > Also, > > "When calculating Order of Appearance, the tree of trees, defined by > the Shadow DOM specification, is used to calculate ordering." > > Assuming the first point holds for nested shadow trees as well, order > of appearance only applies within the same scope, right? Yeah, since different scopes would have resolved earlier. > If so, using "tree of trees" might mislead to think otherwise. Eh, if you just follow the algorithm it's impossible to screw up. And "tree of trees" is the term I want, as it applies between sibling shadow trees. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 04:49:28 UTC