W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

Re: [css-scoping] Shadow Cascading

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 01:00:20 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAnaDvKCOA14zpHiywxoKHKtoR08HxyTtSf9AZCJ2Q3ug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Feb 4, 2015 7:24 PM, "Rune Lillesveen" <rune@opera.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com> wrote:
>
> >> If so, using "tree of trees" might mislead to think otherwise.
> >
> > Eh, if you just follow the algorithm it's impossible to screw up.  And
> > "tree of trees" is the term I want, as it applies between sibling
> > shadow trees.
>
> OK, I'm fine with using "tree of trees", but aren't sibling shadow
> trees also different scopes? That is, the scoping root is the shadow
> root and sibling shadow trees each have a separate shadow root? They
> currently are in Blink fwiw.

Not quite. You can, via `:host >>> .foo`, select into sibling shadows from
inside one of the shadows.

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 09:00:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:01 UTC