W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

[CSS21] Ambiguity in tokenizer, "normative appendix G"

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 21:18:40 +0100
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <p8a2da5lblfe2t45cc087pd56tk4jehd8v@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

  In http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-CSS2-20110607/syndata.html#syntax
"These descriptions are normative. They are also complemented by the
normative grammar rules presented in Appendix G." but Appendix G is
marked "This appendix is non-normative." so that doesn't make sense. 

In 4.1.1. the specification apparently fails to say whether variations
of `url(` at the end of the input are FUNCTION or BAD_URI tokens. They
should probably be BAD_URI tokens.

The CSS 2.2 draft has the same problems.

Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
D-10243 Berlin · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
 Available for hire in Berlin (early 2015)  · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2015 20:19:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:51 UTC