- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 21:18:40 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hi, In http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-CSS2-20110607/syndata.html#syntax "These descriptions are normative. They are also complemented by the normative grammar rules presented in Appendix G." but Appendix G is marked "This appendix is non-normative." so that doesn't make sense. In 4.1.1. the specification apparently fails to say whether variations of `url(` at the end of the input are FUNCTION or BAD_URI tokens. They should probably be BAD_URI tokens. The CSS 2.2 draft has the same problems. regards, -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de D-10243 Berlin · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de Available for hire in Berlin (early 2015) · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2015 20:19:09 UTC