- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 00:13:14 +0900
- To: Bobby Tung <bobbytung@wanderer.tw>
- Cc: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Bobby Tung <bobbytung@wanderer.tw> wrote: > Hi Koji > >> When you say "make tool to generate ruby marked HTML for authors", >> what kind of tag are you trying to generate? Nested ruby? > > We have made a prototype tool for generate ruby with MOEDICT API : > > https://www.moedict.tw/lab/ruby/ > > You can input Hanzi, it will automatically get possible pronunciations from MOE's data, let authors to choose right one. > > Then generate mono-ruby, not nested. This page does not position tone marks at all. I'd like to understand how you want to position tone marks. >> I have no idea what the light tone marks are for and how they're used, >> so if you say it's better to change IME, Word, Pages, and all other >> software, ah...ok, it looks it's harder way to me, but that's your >> call. > > I have tried several ways to find out how to let authors input Bopomofo ruby easier. Actually direct by Bopomofo IME is no a good idea. > > From Word and Pages' function then export to HTML is ok, [1] But not perfect. > > [1]: https://vimeo.com/118596187 I can't see the file. I guess we're not on the same page, sorry if this is my English problem. Let me try to re-write as simple as possible. 1. Do you want browsers to re-order the light tone marks, or do you think it should be done in the source HTML files? 2. I recommend you to initiate an open source font project that handles positioning of second/third/forth tone marks. Fonts only with Bopomofo characters should not be too hard. Does this make sense? /koji
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:13:42 UTC