- From: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:55:02 +1000
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: www International <www-international@w3.org>, "CJK discussion (public-i18n-cjk@w3.org)" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> wrote: > over the weekend i developed a set of basic, user-oriented tests for css > ruby properties and behaviours, and produced results for major browsers. > > you can find the results and links to tests at > http://www.w3.org/International/tests/repo/results/css-ruby Thanks for the great work. > what follows is a high-level summary of results for tests on Firefox, > Chrome, Opera, Safari and Edge: > > all browsers put the annotations 'over' the base by default. No browser > allows you to move the annotation to the other side. No browser supports > bopomofo annotations. These tests do not match the spec. In the CSS Ruby spec, `ruby-position` can only be applied to <rtc>, not <rt>. If you follow that spec, and set the property for <ruby>, then Firefox should work properly, otherwise, that would be an bug of Gecko. > there is some support for ruby-align values in Firefox, but they only work > on the annotations, not the base. By default the browsers align as > 'space-around'. These tests do not match the spec, either. The property `ruby-align` only affects the box it is applied. To make ruby base work, you need to apply that property to <rb>, not <rt>. Alternatively, like `ruby-position`, set the property on <ruby> and just let the descendents inherit it, you should get the expected result, otherwise, that would be an bug of Gecko. > no browser hides an annotation if it is identical to the base text it > annotates (eg. for 'furigana'). Hmm... This seems to be a real bug for us. Thanks for pointing that out. - Xidorn
Received on Monday, 24 August 2015 10:56:11 UTC