W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2015

Re: [selectors-4] :blank pseudo-class

From: Henrik Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:21:13 +0200
Message-ID: <55D61A99.1010306@henke37.cjb.net>
To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Brian Kardell skrev:
> how about :null or :void? 
Given the association of the terms, it would be a poor fit. In theory
:null could be used in some setup to find null pointers in the DOM. And
void is used for return values, not stating content.

And then there is the actual definitions of the words in the English
language. Null is something that no longer is. And void is something
that is no longer applicable.

In short, bad idea.
Received on Thursday, 20 August 2015 18:21:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 20 August 2015 18:21:48 UTC