On 07/25/2015 06:19 AM, Emil Björklund wrote: > > My main point was just that the total size of all tracks would no > longer be defined in one place, which could potentially be confusing, > so maybe the spec should have a note or cross-reference. Hm, that's an interesting point: should the row gaps and column gaps be included in the sizes of the tracks or no? ~fantasaiReceived on Sunday, 9 August 2015 23:27:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 August 2015 23:27:08 UTC