- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 18:46:52 -0700
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
While I was clicking through the flexbox tests liked off of the ED[1], I noticed that some of the tests served by the testsuite (at the moment) are really tests for interactions between flexbox & regions.[2] Obviously, these tests fail in UAs that don't implement regions. Is there any sort of policy on where to put tests like these ones, that depend on features from several in-development mostly-unrelated CSS specs? On the one hand, it's absolutely worthwhile to test the interaction of features. But given that we're grouping testsuites in a per-spec way right now, it seems odd that we'd implicitly mandate that UAs implement an in-development "Spec B" before they can pass the testsuite for a mature very-close-to-CR "Spec A". (except perhaps in cases where there was a tight coupling between the two specs) Thoughts? Is this already laid out somewhere? Am I reading too much into what the testsuites mean? Thanks, ~Daniel [1] http://test.csswg.org/harness/test/css-flexbox-1_dev/ [2] e.g.: http://test.csswg.org/harness/test/css-flexbox-1_dev/autoheight-flexbox-001/ (through 004) http://test.csswg.org/harness/test/css-flexbox-1_dev/autoheight-regions-in-autoheight-flexbox-001/ (through 004) http://test.csswg.org/harness/test/css-flexbox-1_dev/autoheight-regions-in-fixed-sized-flexbox-001/ (through 008)
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2014 01:47:20 UTC