> By broken, do you mean that it renders as plain text rather than HTML? Yes, and it seems incomplete HTML too. Is this not considered broken? :) AK On 8 May 2014, at 13:55, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > On 08/05/2014 12:07, Antony Kennedy wrote: >> Thanks Tab/Simon. >> >> That URL is pretty broken, btw. > > By broken, do you mean that it renders as plain text rather than HTML? > > >> I’d be interested to know why this was deferred - were there some >> complications? > > The decision was made at the last face to face meeting. Here are the relevant minutes: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0607.html > > Unfortunately the reason is not discussed there. fantasai, can you expand? > > -- > Simon Sapin
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2014 13:04:02 UTC