Re: [selectors] Self-referential link pseudo-class

On 08/05/2014 12:07, Antony Kennedy wrote:
> Thanks Tab/Simon.
>
> That URL is pretty broken, btw.

By broken, do you mean that it renders as plain text rather than HTML?


> I’d be interested to know why this was deferred - were there some
> complications?

The decision was made at the last face to face meeting. Here are the 
relevant minutes:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0607.html

Unfortunately the reason is not discussed there. fantasai, can you expand?

-- 
Simon Sapin

Received on Thursday, 8 May 2014 12:56:16 UTC