- From: Corey Ford <corey@coreyford.name>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:19:47 +0100
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 17:20:24 UTC
On 2014-03-14 18:12, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > The spec draft seems to say this, for what it's worth: > > The effect of ‘position: sticky’ on table elements is the same as for > ‘position: relative’ > > which doesn't make sense to me at all.... Did it mean table internal > elements? Even then it doesn't make sense, but it _really_ doesn't make > sense for table elements. That text appears to be referencing the preceding entry about 'position: relative', which uses the term 'table elements' to define the effect of relative positioning on 'display: table-*' things. Corey
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 17:20:24 UTC