- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:24:19 -0400
- To: Corey Ford <corey@coreyford.name>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
On 3/14/14 1:19 PM, Corey Ford wrote: > That text appears to be referencing the preceding entry about 'position: > relative', which uses the term 'table elements' to define the effect of > relative positioning on 'display: table-*' things. The term "table elements", as defined at http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#tables-intro last paragraph includes "display: table". If one wants "display: table-*" then one wants "internal table elements". It might also be worth clarifying that this is talking about how offsetting works, not whether it happens at all. The current text makes it sound like for "table elements" position:sticky should behave exactly like position:relative, which is not the case. -Boris
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 17:24:49 UTC