- From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 21:26:08 +0000
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- CC: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>, "<www-style@w3.org>" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mar 4, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > On 04/03/2014 19:06, Glenn Adams wrote: > Cox would like to see box-decoration-break restored to this > specification rather than postponed to Level 4. > > Hi, > > The property is not postponed to Backgrounds and Borders Level 4, it has been moved to the Fragmentation module: > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-break/#break-decoration > > ok, thanks for correcting that; in any case, Cox is concerned that moving it into another spec will delay it being published in a final (REC) form, as compared to leaving it in B&B3 > > Given that REC requires 2+ implementations passing test cases for the feature, this concern suggests we have 1) sufficient test case coverage of box-decoration-break to establish that 2) there is a good interop. Do we have 1) and the data for 2) ? Or is Cox maybe offering to share the testcases in 1) that confirm 2) ? I think it’s great if box-decoration-break is interoperable; but if it’s not there yet, holding back REC for a number of B&B features with better cross-UA support may not be a better trade-off.
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2014 21:26:41 UTC