- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:45:57 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2014 19:46:46 UTC
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > On 04/03/2014 19:06, Glenn Adams wrote: > >> Cox would like to see box-decoration-break restored to this >> specification rather than postponed to Level 4. >> > > Hi, > > The property is not postponed to Backgrounds and Borders Level 4, it has > been moved to the Fragmentation module: > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-break/#break-decoration ok, thanks for correcting that; in any case, Cox is concerned that moving it into another spec will delay it being published in a final (REC) form, as compared to leaving it in B&B3 > > > > In particular, we note >> that there appears to be a reasonable level of implementation support >> already present in common browsers. Furthermore, it is expected that >> TTML2 will make use of box-decoration-break with a value of "clone", in >> order to map certain TTML formatting semantics to an equivalent HTML/CSS >> representation [1]. >> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal015#box-decoration-break >> > > > -- > Simon Sapin >
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2014 19:46:46 UTC