W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2014

Re: [css-writing-modes][CSS21][css3-ui] defining 'cursor: auto' properly (Issue 48)

From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 10:10:30 +0900
Message-ID: <CAN9ydbU-Y6iUb78e2miRYVnnhuHyyx2bGPU+EY4RZ1NFKwgmEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Yeah, right, I was confused with carets, sorry about that.

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:
> I don’t think we should go with a MUST level requirement that the cursor be perpendicular to the path (although I don’t think there’d be anything wrong with a MAY, if any UA is willing to rotate cursors in a fine grained manner, more power to them), but we may want to make a requirement of switching between horizontal and vertical when the angle of the text / tangent of the path cross +/- 45 degrees.

I think we should keep it "MAY". We should not prevent UA doing
better, but UA might not want to do that while elements are animating.

Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2014 01:10:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:49 UTC