Re: [css3-background] PFWG input on focus ring

> On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:05, Antony Kennedy <booshtukka@me.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 28 Jul 2014, at 09:01, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Antony Kennedy <booshtukka@me.com> wrote:
>>>> On 25 Jul 2014, at 12:14, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>>>> On 07/25/2014 07:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/25/14, 2:08 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>>>>>> There is not. It has to either be marked !important in the UA style
>>>>>>> sheet by the UA, or duplicated in the user style sheet and marked
>>>>>>> !important.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That said, if we did have a "default" value which meant "cascaded UA-level
>>>>>> value" in user sheets and "cascaded UA+user level value" in author sheets),
>>>>>> and the default focus ring were in fact a UA-level value, then doing
>>>>>> "default !important" in a user sheet would in fact work.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I thought the only reason we didn't have that was implementation
>>>>> concerns? If people are down with it, I can add that easily.
>>>> 
>>>> s/add/re-add/ ;)
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css3-cascade-20130103/#default
>>> 
>>> For my use case, I would like to have a single user stylesheet that states e.g.
>>> 
>>> :focus {outline: default !important;}
>>> 
>>> Which maintains the author defined focus outline, and stops authors from overriding it. This seems like it would meet this requirement?
>> 
>> Assuming you meant "UA-defined focus outline", then yes, that would do
>> what you want.
>> 
>> ~TJ
>> 
> 
> US-defined, yes, sorry.
> 

UA-defined, even.

Received on Friday, 8 August 2014 17:07:54 UTC