- From: Antony Kennedy <booshtukka@me.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 18:06:07 +0000
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> On 28 Jul 2014, at 09:01, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Antony Kennedy <booshtukka@me.com> wrote: >>> On 25 Jul 2014, at 12:14, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >>> On 07/25/2014 07:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: >>>>> On 7/25/14, 2:08 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>>>>> There is not. It has to either be marked !important in the UA style >>>>>> sheet by the UA, or duplicated in the user style sheet and marked >>>>>> !important. >>>>> >>>>> That said, if we did have a "default" value which meant "cascaded UA-level >>>>> value" in user sheets and "cascaded UA+user level value" in author sheets), >>>>> and the default focus ring were in fact a UA-level value, then doing >>>>> "default !important" in a user sheet would in fact work. >>>> >>>> I thought the only reason we didn't have that was implementation >>>> concerns? If people are down with it, I can add that easily. >>> >>> s/add/re-add/ ;) >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css3-cascade-20130103/#default >> >> For my use case, I would like to have a single user stylesheet that states e.g. >> >> :focus {outline: default !important;} >> >> Which maintains the author defined focus outline, and stops authors from overriding it. This seems like it would meet this requirement? > > Assuming you meant "UA-defined focus outline", then yes, that would do > what you want. > > ~TJ > US-defined, yes, sorry.
Received on Friday, 8 August 2014 17:07:46 UTC