- From: Antony Kennedy <booshtukka@me.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 04:04:40 +0000
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-id: <2006601A-7953-4451-9D94-278DFC5E3A0B@me.com> (sfid-20140730_040447_458851_14CE66D5)
> On 28 Jul 2014, at 09:01, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Antony Kennedy <booshtukka@me.com> wrote: >>> On 25 Jul 2014, at 12:14, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >>> On 07/25/2014 07:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: >>>>> On 7/25/14, 2:08 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>>>>> There is not. It has to either be marked !important in the UA style >>>>>> sheet by the UA, or duplicated in the user style sheet and marked >>>>>> !important. >>>>> >>>>> That said, if we did have a "default" value which meant "cascaded UA-level >>>>> value" in user sheets and "cascaded UA+user level value" in author sheets), >>>>> and the default focus ring were in fact a UA-level value, then doing >>>>> "default !important" in a user sheet would in fact work. >>>> >>>> I thought the only reason we didn't have that was implementation >>>> concerns? If people are down with it, I can add that easily. >>> >>> s/add/re-add/ ;) >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css3-cascade-20130103/#default >> >> For my use case, I would like to have a single user stylesheet that states e.g. >> >> :focus {outline: default !important;} >> >> Which maintains the author defined focus outline, and stops authors from overriding it. This seems like it would meet this requirement? > > Assuming you meant "UA-defined focus outline", then yes, that would do > what you want. > > ~TJ > Do we have a way to apply this with a cross-selector? For example, say I have: <div role=“button” tabindex=“0” id=“fake button”>Focus me</div> Is there a way to apply the UA default focus outline for a button element to this element on focus? A
Received on Friday, 8 August 2014 17:08:25 UTC