Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions

Simon Pieters wrote:
> Or just
>
> DOMPoint transformPoint(DOMPointLiteral point);
>
> This was already discussed:
>
> http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDDF1fRrJj08AvFARfCstkQfgg=RH85n-UPh3ZZ_fjc2wA@mail.gmail.com

Of course.  I should know that. ;)

As for Dirk's question on whether you would ever want to get a plain 
object back from transformPoint, and not an instance of DOMPoint, I 
can't think why that'd be useful.  (It would be different, of course, as 
you'd be able to assign to .x without the type coercion happening, but 
why would you need to be able to do that?)