Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions

On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:30:06 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
>> Why do we need both DOMPoint and DOMPointLiteral?
>
> DOMPointLiteral exists so that you can call methods that expect points
> without having to wrap it in a verbose DOMPoint() constructor at
> call-time.
>
> That is, you can say "el.transformPoint({x:5, y:10})" instead of
> "el.transformPoint(new DOMPoint(5, 10))".

transformPoint, is that convertPointFromNode or something else?

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software