On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:06:29 +0200, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> > wrote: > > If we want the members of DOMRect to be mutable but only if it's not >> associated with a DOMQuad's .bounds, that can be specced by having those >> members check for the association and throw on setting in that case. >> > > I think we have the opposite problem for a DOMRect instance if DOMRect > inherits from DOMQuad. Should mutating the points throw if the object is a > DOMRect? Who said anything about DOMRect inheriting from DOMQuad? It shouldn't, IMHO. Constructing a DOMQuad from a DOMRect is good enough. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2013 23:34:43 UTC