W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2013

Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:07 +0200
To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "Simon Fraser" <smfr@me.com>, "Dirk Schulze" <dschulze@adobe.com>, "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.w3xrehj3idj3kv@simons-macbook-pro.local>
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:06:29 +0200, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:

> If we want the members of DOMRect to be mutable but only if it's not  
> associated with a DOMQuad's .bounds, that can be specced by having those  
> members check for the association and throw on setting in that case.

I think we have the opposite problem for a DOMRect instance if DOMRect  
inherits from DOMQuad. Should mutating the points throw if the object is a  
DOMRect?

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2013 22:00:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:34 UTC