W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2013

Re: [spec tools] spec tools should be checked into the csswg repo

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 10:52:47 +0100
Message-ID: <523D6C6F.403@exyr.org>
To: www-style@w3.org
Le 21/09/2013 09:32, Dirk Schulze a ťcrit :
> Does the CSS WG have an GitHub account? Would it be ok if this
> account would fork bikeshed from Tab and it gets merged once in a
> while? Would that be sufficient enough? Maybe the concern is just
> that Tab could (theoretically) restrict access to the repo, or the
> account is lost/not available anymore for what ever reason.

We have a mirror of our Mercurial repository in W3Cís GitHub account, 
but no CSS WG account that I know of:

As long as Tab is doing the work of maintaining Bikeshed I think itís 
fine to leave the respository in his control. Itís not like we depend on 
that repository URL anyway, we can always start to pull updates from 
somewhere else.

If it helps, we could also setup a Mecurial mirror of Bikeshed.

Simon Sapin
Received on Saturday, 21 September 2013 09:53:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:32 UTC