- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 01:32:00 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Does the CSS WG have an GitHub account? Would it be ok if this account would fork bikeshed from Tab and it gets merged once in a while? Would that be sufficient enough? Maybe the concern is just that Tab could (theoretically) restrict access to the repo, or the account is lost/not available anymore for what ever reason. Greetings, Dirk On Sep 21, 2013, at 8:48 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:27 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> I think what John means is that in order to work with CSSWG specs, >> one only needs to learn one VCS and pull one repo. Yes, everything >> for Bikeshed is in one repo, but Bikeshed is not in the CSSWG repo. > > And if we put an appropriate curl script in the dvcs repo, they can do > that. Even if we stored Bikeshed in the dvcs repo, you can't use it > straight from there - you have to install some dependencies as well. > > Plus, Bikeshed *is* intended to be useful for more than just CSS. > Even if you *could* run it without installing anything else, I'd be > loathe to put it directly in the CSSWG repo for that reason. > > ~TJ >
Received on Saturday, 21 September 2013 08:32:26 UTC