- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 01:00:35 +0200
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: "www-style\@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Alan Stearns wrote: > > > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-page-floats/exclusions-dropcap.png > >My preferred solution would be: > > > > exclude-level: 0.5; > > shape-margin: 0.2em; /* or something */ > > You would probably also need to include some margin-top somewhere (as you > do in your specification) Yes, that would add one line: .dropcap { exclude-level: 0.5; shape-margin: 0.2em; margin-top: -0.2em; } http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-page-floats/#exclusions-based-on-rendered-content > to make sure the content did not run through the > ascender area above the lower-case letters in this example. So you'd > probably still end up with some content-specific styling. Content-specific? The style sheet above can be applied any content in English, Greek, Russian -- any bicameral script. (Any other script, too, it just raises the cap(s) slightly) In your example, you basiscally outline the 'y' in the style sheet: #dropMany{ wrap-flow: right; shape-outside: polygon(0px,0px 280px,0px 220px,125px 0px,125px); } Are there any security implications of outlining the shape of glyphs from the content in the style sheet? In any case, I request that the CSS WG ask authors -- including fora beyond www-style -- what kind of code they prefer to write. -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Sunday, 15 September 2013 23:01:18 UTC