W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2013

Re: [CSSOM] Revisiting transforms and getBoundingClientRect()

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:06:29 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLZ0TdtZYoANgAFcJ7vxPGBZQaorG6hfgauVhAm7yczK7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Andrew Dupont <w3@andrewdupont.net>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >> OK, but that doesn't explicitly address renaming ClientRect(List), which
> >> unlike the APIs discussed in that chat log has some (probably miniscule)
> >> compatibility risk.
> >
> > BTW I think we should rename it; I just want to make sure we really are
> > going to.
>
> Let's just do some compat testing, then, and decide on it.
>

OK then, I'll land our patch to do the rename and see what happens.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*
Received on Sunday, 15 September 2013 22:06:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:34 UTC