Re: [css-fonts-3] i18n-ISSUE-300: ja-jp too verbose

 > *:lang(ja-jp) would be better as *:lang(ja) - there is no need for the
 > jp, and the general recommendation is to keep the language tag as short
 > as possible.

I’m as confused as Jens. No need for JP and keeping language tags as 
short as possible means to prefer *:lang(ja) over *:lang(ja-jp).

And wouldn’t an example using *:lang(zh-Hant) be more appropriate than 
*:lang(zh-tw)?

Gunnar

Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 08:16:03 UTC