- From: Gunnar Bittersmann <gunnar@bittersmann.de>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:15:37 +0200
- To: www-international@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
> *:lang(ja-jp) would be better as *:lang(ja) - there is no need for the > jp, and the general recommendation is to keep the language tag as short > as possible. I’m as confused as Jens. No need for JP and keeping language tags as short as possible means to prefer *:lang(ja) over *:lang(ja-jp). And wouldn’t an example using *:lang(zh-Hant) be more appropriate than *:lang(zh-tw)? Gunnar
Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 08:16:03 UTC