- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:05:14 +0100
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Addison Phillips <addison@lab126.com>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:46 AM, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com> wrote: > Hmmm. "Valid Unicode codepoint" seems fine to me, it's talking about the > codepoint, not whether there's a character represented by that or not. > But I'm not going to quibble, I've updated the spec to remove the term. Well the difference matters. Can we render any code point, or do we only render Unicode scalar values (code points minus lone surrogates). I'm kinda hoping the latter, but I'm pretty sure in Gecko at least it's the former. Whether unicode-range should support lone surrogates might be separate from that I suppose. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 08:05:42 UTC