Re: [css-fonts-3] i18n-ISSUE-300: ja-jp too verbose

Hi Jens,

It has already been updated.

RI

On 13/09/2013 07:02, Jens O. Meiert wrote:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-fonts-3-20130711/#font-matching-examples
>>
>> *:lang(ja-jp) would be better as *:lang(ja) - there is no need for the jp,
>> and the general recommendation is to keep the language tag as short as
>> possible.
>
> Has this already been updated, or did you mean the other way around
> (“*:lang(ja) would be better as *:lang(ja-jp)”)?
>
> (Just a curious bystander though.)
>


-- 
Richard Ishida