> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-fonts-3-20130711/#font-matching-examples > > *:lang(ja-jp) would be better as *:lang(ja) - there is no need for the jp, > and the general recommendation is to keep the language tag as short as > possible. Has this already been updated, or did you mean the other way around (“*:lang(ja) would be better as *:lang(ja-jp)”)? (Just a curious bystander though.) -- Jens O. Meiert http://meiert.com/en/ ✂ http://onethousandthankyous.org/Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 06:03:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:34 UTC