- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 07:14:57 +0100
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- CC: Addison Phillips <addison@lab126.com>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
Looks good to me. RI On 13/09/2013 05:49, John Daggett wrote: > > Addison Phillips wrote: > >> The problem is that rule 1b states: >> >> # If a sequence of multiple codepoints is canonically equivalent to a >> # single character and the font supports that character, select this >> # font for the sequence. >> >> "Select the font" isn't the same as "select the font and use the >> canonically equivalent character glyph for the sequence". We know >> (and greatly appreciate!) that most modern layout engines already do >> this. But if you just select the font and don't render the grapheme >> sequence with the corresponding glyph you'll get tofu. Perhaps >> that's overly obvious? > > Ok, I've updated the spec to indicate that the precomposed glyph is > used for the entire cluster. > > Please let me know if this satisfies your concerns. > > Cheers, > > John Daggett > -- Richard Ishida
Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 06:15:30 UTC