- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:26:30 -0500
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Oct 28, 2013, at 9:18 AM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: > On 10/28/13 7:09 AM, "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > >> * fantasai wrote: >>> The CSSWG recently published CSS Cascading and Inheritance Level 3 >>> as a Candidate Recommendation: >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-cascade/ >>> >>> W3C encourages implementations of this module, and welcomes >>> feedback resulting from such implementation. Requests for new >>> features will be assigned to Level 4. >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2013OctDec/0079.html the >> Working Group might want to check out why W3C Management considers the >> document to be dead, and let us know if that is proper and intentional. > > The "Retired" heading is showing up on every publication history page I've > accessed. I think either it's a mistake that it's showing up, or it's a > mistake to interpret it the way Ian did. Perhaps it's only meant to be > relevant if there's a date entry under the heading? Aha, that makes sense. I hadn't noticed. I'll let the Webmaster know. Thanks! Ian -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 14:26:38 UTC