W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [css-cascade] CSS Cascade Level 3 Candidate Recommendation

From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:18:32 -0700
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "ij@w3.org" <ij@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE93BFDD.147CE%stearns@adobe.com>
On 10/28/13 7:09 AM, "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:

>* fantasai wrote:
>>The CSSWG recently published CSS Cascading and Inheritance Level 3
>>as a Candidate Recommendation:
>>   http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-cascade/
>>W3C encourages implementations of this module, and welcomes
>>feedback resulting from such implementation. Requests for new
>>features will be assigned to Level 4.
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2013OctDec/0079.html the
>Working Group might want to check out why W3C Management considers the
>document to be dead, and let us know if that is proper and intentional.

The "Retired" heading is showing up on every publication history page I've
accessed. I think either it's a mistake that it's showing up, or it's a
mistake to interpret it the way Ian did. Perhaps it's only meant to be
relevant if there's a date entry under the heading?


Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 14:19:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:03 UTC