- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:18:32 -0700
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "ij@w3.org" <ij@w3.org>
On 10/28/13 7:09 AM, "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: >* fantasai wrote: >>The CSSWG recently published CSS Cascading and Inheritance Level 3 >>as a Candidate Recommendation: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-cascade/ >> >>W3C encourages implementations of this module, and welcomes >>feedback resulting from such implementation. Requests for new >>features will be assigned to Level 4. > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2013OctDec/0079.html the >Working Group might want to check out why W3C Management considers the >document to be dead, and let us know if that is proper and intentional. The "Retired" heading is showing up on every publication history page I've accessed. I think either it's a mistake that it's showing up, or it's a mistake to interpret it the way Ian did. Perhaps it's only meant to be relevant if there's a date entry under the heading? Thanks, Alan
Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 14:19:05 UTC