- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:50:42 -0500
- To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: shane@aptest.com, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Oct 28, 2013, at 12:25 AM, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > On 2013/10/22 3:02, Ian Jacobs wrote: >> >> On Oct 21, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Shane McCarron<ahby@aptest.com> wrote: >> >>> Hmm. I think it is important that TR/short-name/ continue to work as it has. The industry knows this is where you go to find specs, and I wouldn't want to have to *decide* which one to read. On the other hand, I think a convention that was TR/short-name/menu or list or something would be great! A standardized way to get to the list of all versions of a spec >> >> We have that today for all specs. Click on the date on the TR page. Example: >> http://www.w3.org/standards/history/css-cascade-3 > > That page shows "Retired" at the bottom. What does that mean? I can't imagine a spec that went to CR on 2013-10-03 to be retired already. Retired means "The group told us they don't intend to pursue it but are not yet ready to publish an end Note." Ian -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 13:51:15 UTC