- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:13:20 -0700
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > On Oct 3, 2013, at 2:46 AM, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> On 10/02/2013 11:16 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: >>> Furthermore we were in an agreement that <position> is a mistake >>> that we can't undo because of existing implementations. >> >> I'm not sure who you think "we" is. Certainly there is no >> such resolution amongst the WG as a whole. > > We came to this conclusion and resolved it for transforms in spring last year. As a WG! I'm not going back to look it up right now, but I think that was in the context of Transforms having 3d position. Iirc, it may have even been specifically about the fact that the 3-clause form of <position> makes it impossible to extend into 3d naturally. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 18:14:06 UTC