W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [css-overflow-clipping][css-overflow] First Draft of Overflow Clipping now available!

From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:12:13 -0700
To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE72E32F.DADE%galineau@adobe.com>


On 10/3/13 2:49 AM, "Alan Gresley" <alan@css-class.com> wrote:

>On 3/10/2013 5:53 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>
>> Yesterday, I finished up the first draft of the overflow:clip spec:
>> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-overflow-clipping/>
>>
>> It passed a quick review from Blink implementors, so I'd appreciate
>>more review!
>>
>> ~TJ
>
>How can a new value of clip be used for the property of overflow when
>clip is a property itself [1] (e.g. CSS2.1)?

Because there is no connection between the two? :)

There is no hard requirement for value keywords to exclude existing
property names (or vice-versa), afaik. Though it's quite reasonable to
avoid it to mitigate unnecessary confusion, which one might argue is
possible here. Also, now that property names can be used as a value for
transitions you could end up with the same value being a property or a
keyword depending on where you write it.

Honestly can't think of a good alternate name though. clip seems pretty
decent for this. 

This may all be moot as Tab is considering putting this switch in a
different property.



>
>Why is a new value of overflow being introduced into a new spec and not
>just (CSS3/CSS4) css-overflow [2]?
>
>How can a new spec 'css-overflow-clipping' be introduced when the spec
>where is being dragged from, being 'css-overflow' is incomplete and
>unclear?
>
>How can such differing behavior between Firefox/Chrome vs IE10/Opera be
>overlooked in this test case [3] or Firefox/IE10/Opera vs Chrome be
>overlooked in this test case [4] when this will impact on the behavior
>that is partly defined in 'css-overflow-clipping'?
>
>Alan
>
>
>1. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visufx.html

>2. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-overflow/

>3. 
><http://css-class.com/test/css/overflow/block-inside-auto-width-float-over

>flow.htm>
>4. <http://css-class.com/test/css/visformatting/float-computed-used.htm>
>
>
>-- 
>Alan Gresley
>http://css-3d.org/

>http://css-class.com/

>

Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 16:12:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:02 UTC