- From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:12:13 -0700
- To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/3/13 2:49 AM, "Alan Gresley" <alan@css-class.com> wrote: >On 3/10/2013 5:53 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >> Yesterday, I finished up the first draft of the overflow:clip spec: >> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-overflow-clipping/> >> >> It passed a quick review from Blink implementors, so I'd appreciate >>more review! >> >> ~TJ > >How can a new value of clip be used for the property of overflow when >clip is a property itself [1] (e.g. CSS2.1)? Because there is no connection between the two? :) There is no hard requirement for value keywords to exclude existing property names (or vice-versa), afaik. Though it's quite reasonable to avoid it to mitigate unnecessary confusion, which one might argue is possible here. Also, now that property names can be used as a value for transitions you could end up with the same value being a property or a keyword depending on where you write it. Honestly can't think of a good alternate name though. clip seems pretty decent for this. This may all be moot as Tab is considering putting this switch in a different property. > >Why is a new value of overflow being introduced into a new spec and not >just (CSS3/CSS4) css-overflow [2]? > >How can a new spec 'css-overflow-clipping' be introduced when the spec >where is being dragged from, being 'css-overflow' is incomplete and >unclear? > >How can such differing behavior between Firefox/Chrome vs IE10/Opera be >overlooked in this test case [3] or Firefox/IE10/Opera vs Chrome be >overlooked in this test case [4] when this will impact on the behavior >that is partly defined in 'css-overflow-clipping'? > >Alan > > >1. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visufx.html >2. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-overflow/ >3. ><http://css-class.com/test/css/overflow/block-inside-auto-width-float-over >flow.htm> >4. <http://css-class.com/test/css/visformatting/float-computed-used.htm> > > >-- >Alan Gresley >http://css-3d.org/ >http://css-class.com/ >
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 16:12:50 UTC