- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 23:12:58 +0800
- To: www-style@w3.org, "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:19:18 +0800, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > On 13/11/13 00:17, HÃ¥kon Wium Lie wrote: >> Also sprach Tab Atkins Jr.: >> >> > Media Queries currently states that it purposely went with the >> > min/max- prefix approach for range-type queries specifically to avoid >> > any issues with the "<" character in HTML/XML syntax. >> >> Yes, we were forced to use the contrived min/max syntax due to >> SGML/XML. If I recall correctly, only "<" was technically banned. >> >> > Instead, I propose we add another syntax possibility to MQs: >> > >> > (width < 400px) >> > (device-height > 1000px) >> >> This is much better. > > > This is not only better. This is _finally_ the original MQ syntax [1] > that we were forced to forget [2] and move to min-/max- [3]. Yes, I am > the > guilty one for suggesting this but we had no other choice at that time. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-css3-mediaqueries-20010404/ > [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2000OctDec/0083.html > [3] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2000OctDec/0086.html More academic trivia: So [2] claims that bare < and & in quoted attributes are invalid HTML4, but that's also not correct. They are allowed, at least if the next character after & is not a namestart character. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 15:14:50 UTC