W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2013

Re: [css3-background] background-attachment: local

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 16:44:25 +0800
Message-ID: <51A862E9.7040506@exyr.org>
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, W3C CSS Mailing List <www-style@w3.org>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>
Le 31/05/2013 15:35, Simon Sapin a écrit :
> Le 30/05/2013 00:22, Simon Sapin a écrit :
>> Le 30/05/2013 00:06, Simon Fraser a écrit :
>>>> Yes, I think it makes sense for the background positioning area to
>>>> be in sized to the scrolled content, since this is where it is
>>>> attached.
>>> Is the size of the scrolled content area well defined?
>>
>> Actually, even the concept of scrolled content area is not something we
>> have in CSS as far as I know. We would have to add it somewhere, and
>> also define its size. Although maybe the size could be left undefined in
>> Backgrounds L3.
>
> Another case is when the scrolled content is smaller than the container,
> so that there is no actual scrolling. Do the background painting and
> positioning areas extend to the end of the container?

The answer to this in WebKit, Presto and Trident is yes.

-- 
Simon Sapin
Received on Friday, 31 May 2013 08:44:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:30 UTC