W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2013

Re: [css3-background] background-attachment: local

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 15:35:14 +0800
Message-ID: <51A852B2.8060307@exyr.org>
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, W3C CSS Mailing List <www-style@w3.org>
Le 30/05/2013 00:22, Simon Sapin a écrit :
> Le 30/05/2013 00:06, Simon Fraser a écrit :
>>> Yes, I think it makes sense for the background positioning area to
>>> be in sized to the scrolled content, since this is where it is
>>> attached.
>> Is the size of the scrolled content area well defined?
>
> Actually, even the concept of scrolled content area is not something we
> have in CSS as far as I know. We would have to add it somewhere, and
> also define its size. Although maybe the size could be left undefined in
> Backgrounds L3.

Another case is when the scrolled content is smaller than the container, 
so that there is no actual scrolling. Do the background painting and 
positioning areas extend to the end of the container?

-- 
Simon Sapin
Received on Friday, 31 May 2013 07:35:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:30 UTC