- From: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 02:48:52 -0400
- To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
2013/3/25 Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>: > You can still use @media print { ... } styles for document *content* > styling. > > But for printed page decorations like page number, url > fields then it is really not business of CSS. > > If to follow logic of css3-page then we should also > have special style sections for defining UA's chrome when > page is presented in window so @media screen. > > That could be cool to have for some extreme CSSiers but > I have some doubts that anyone from UAs vendors will sign under > this. I don’t know how you feel when you develop intranet apps, but back when I was doing that I was very unhappy about how the page numbers, headers, and footers all looked different in different browsers and there was no way to control page layout in CSS, even if I felt certain properties ought to have at least some effect. So I suppose what you are proposing is not any worse than the status quo a few years ago. Back to PDF generation, I suppose, if only PDF generators had the same capabilities as modern CSS. -- cheers, -ambrose <http://gniw.ca>
Received on Monday, 25 March 2013 06:49:24 UTC