François REMY skriver: > If I'm not mistaken, here is the kind of selectors Brian's proposal is aimed to : > > :not(#a) { > selects all elements that are not #a > } > > :and(#a *, #b *) { > selects all elements that have both a #a and a #b parent > } > > :or(#a, #b) { > selects all elements that are either #a or #b > } > > The other proposals (like anyOf, oneOf...) can be emulated using those three. Currently, we already have ':not()' (but I think it's somewhat limited to simple selectors) and it's already possible to emulate ':or()' using commas. So "a :or(b,c) d" == "a b d, a c d". So what's really missing is the ':and' operator. > > (Brian if I'm wrong please correct me) > > Boolean algebra says that you can fake and using or. !(!X || !Y) == X && Y It works in the other direction too. !(!X && !Y) == X || YReceived on Wednesday, 13 March 2013 19:02:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:27 UTC