W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2013

Exit criteria in the wake of 3 engines

From: Paul Irish <paul.irish@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 01:11:34 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHSVx=9fAa-5JtpvFdouLszprEsG2R1ijwNPbU4b47yquzAgjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
In exit criteria for many of the specs we see text like: "each
implementation must be developed by a different party and cannot share,
reuse, or derive from code used by another qualifying implementation"

With Opera adopting Chromium, this criterium appears to have gotten
significantly more challenging to satisfy.

There were 6 two-implementation possibilities with Presto and without, that
number is reduced to 3.

Is revisiting the exit criteria worthwhile now that it seems far more
difficult to move a spec to Rec?
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 09:12:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:27 UTC